Post by account_disabled on Dec 26, 2023 1:54:17 GMT -7
Jane AustenAccording to an expert, Professor Kathryn Sutherland, a literature teacher at Oxford University, who examined 1100 original unpublished pages by Jane Austen , her works were certainly subjected to editing, to correct spelling and grammatical errors. Instead, it is common practice to accept what the writer's brother said in 1818, namely that Austen was a perfect master of writing, master of sentences and expressions and of calculated punctuation. And today this point of view is still maintained. But when reading the manuscripts all this precision disappears. Deletions, confusions, defects and broken grammatical rules emerged from the manuscripts, Sutherland claims.
And she goes on to say that the clean punctuation and epigrammatic style characteristic of her novels are absent from the manuscripts, a sign that someone else was involved in her work. And it appears that these corrections were made by his editor and talent scout William Gifford, according to letters written between Gifford and publisher John Murray II.The Special Data gentleman finished with a groan, allowing himself one last, angry movement in the girl's body. Another woman had been hers, stolen from her legitimate husband, who had been left waiting helplessly. Smiling, she dressed and went out.led the scent of freshly picked flowers and other fragrances that she couldn't recognize.
She glimpsed the woman's form, motionless under her sheets. He caressed her face, which seemed strangely cold to him. He then tore off her dress, took off his trousers and penetrated her forcefully. The girl was terrified, the man thought, she didn't move or say a word. She hoped that he had hurt her while deflowering her, even though that type of woman was so proud that he would never admit it. During intercourse the man had frantically groped and kissed that body which remained inert, without heat, like a silent surrender to that manifestation of authority and power. The gentleman finished with a groan, allowing himself one last, angry movement in the girl's body. Another woman had been hers, stolen from her legitimate husband, who had been left waiting helplessly. Smiling, she dressed and went out.
And she goes on to say that the clean punctuation and epigrammatic style characteristic of her novels are absent from the manuscripts, a sign that someone else was involved in her work. And it appears that these corrections were made by his editor and talent scout William Gifford, according to letters written between Gifford and publisher John Murray II.The Special Data gentleman finished with a groan, allowing himself one last, angry movement in the girl's body. Another woman had been hers, stolen from her legitimate husband, who had been left waiting helplessly. Smiling, she dressed and went out.led the scent of freshly picked flowers and other fragrances that she couldn't recognize.
She glimpsed the woman's form, motionless under her sheets. He caressed her face, which seemed strangely cold to him. He then tore off her dress, took off his trousers and penetrated her forcefully. The girl was terrified, the man thought, she didn't move or say a word. She hoped that he had hurt her while deflowering her, even though that type of woman was so proud that he would never admit it. During intercourse the man had frantically groped and kissed that body which remained inert, without heat, like a silent surrender to that manifestation of authority and power. The gentleman finished with a groan, allowing himself one last, angry movement in the girl's body. Another woman had been hers, stolen from her legitimate husband, who had been left waiting helplessly. Smiling, she dressed and went out.